51

Skip to content

Councillor slams Parks for ‘ludicrous’ planning proposal

Parks Canada approved the Downtown Hostel’s development plan (pictured here) in November.

Parks Canada approved the Downtown Hostel’s development plan (pictured here) in November. The original proposal included five parking stalls in front of the building on Patricia Street, but the municipality opposed the plan because it would require vehicles to cross a busy sidewalk.
Parks Canada approved the Downtown Hostel’s development plan (pictured here) in November. The original proposal included five parking stalls in front of the building on Patricia Street, but the municipality opposed the plan because it would require vehicles to cross a busy sidewalk.

Councillor Gilbert Wall didn’t mince words when he criticized Parks Canada for approving a development proposal that would have allowed up to five vehicles to park on the property in front of the Jasper Downtown Hostel.

“It’s staggering how poorly planned this is,” said Wall, during a council meeting on April 4.

“The fact that they’re allowed to have a development that requires 18 parking stalls and only providing four on site that really meet the definition of a real parking stall is absolutely ludicrous.”

Parking in and around the hostel, which is located on the corner of Patricia Street and Pyramid Lake Road, has become a major issue for both the owners and residents in the area.

In August, the hostel told the Planning and Development Advisory Committee (PDAC), that it wanted to expand its facilities by adding 32 new beds for a total of 60. The request also included adding a lounge, guest kitchen, lobby and two bedrooms for staff accommodation.

As part of its proposal, the hostel asked to add four more parking stalls, significantly fewer than Parks Canada’s regulations call for.

According to the rules, the hostel is supposed to have one parking spot for every four beds, however the owners told PDAC they didn’t need that many parking spots because a lot of their guests arrive by bus or other forms of transportation.

In November, Parks Canada approved PDAC’s recommendation, which required the hostel to provide 12 more parking stalls to meet its development requirements for a total of 18.

Nine of those parking stalls were originally supposed to be located on the hostel’s property, with four stalls located in the back and five stalls in the front, including three “sub-standard” stalls and a tandem stall. The other nine stalls were paid for in 2015 and 2016 to the parking authority in lieu of an actual stall.

Businesses must pay into the fund when their on-site parking requirements can’t be met. Those funds are then used to create more parking in town.

Despite receiving Parks Canada’s approval, administration rejected the hostel’s parking proposal arguing that the five stalls in front of the building would require vehicles to frequently cross one of the town’s busiest sidewalks.

“If you drove a Suburban from the airport and you’re parking in front of that building you’re going to have four feet of your Suburban on our sidewalk,” said Wall.

“My thought right now is to throw it right back at Parks and say ‘find a solution.’”

Steve Young, a communications officer for Parks Canada, tried to down play the rift between Parks Canada and the municipality.

“Parks Canada values its strong working relationship with the municipality of Jasper. Jasper National Park and the municipality of Jasper will continue their efforts to work together for the community as a whole,” Young wrote, acknowledging the municipality’s safety concerns with the proposal that was originally approved.

To try and resolve the issue, Fercho proposed expanding the parking lot on Patricia Street, across from the Visitor Information Centre and designating three of the parking stalls specifically for the hostel for a determined period of time and price. The other two spots would be paid for in lieu of a parking stall.

He stressed several times during the meeting that expanding the parking lot and possibly designating three parking spots were two separate and distinct decisions and are not dependent on each other.

If council decides not to designate three parking stalls for the hostel the issue will have to go back to PDAC for approval.

The proposal to designate three stalls didn’t sit well with most councillors.

“I really don’t like the idea of designated stalls unless it’s open to all businesses, so I’m inclined to say let it go back to PDAC,” said Coun. Helen Kelleher-Empey.

Mayor Richard Ireland also chimed in, adding that he would be more comfortable if the hostel kept the four parking stalls at the back of the building and paid the parking authority for the rest.

Fercho agreed that would be easiest way to resolve the issue, but said it could lead to more parking pressure in the area and would have to go back to PDAC.

Coun. Dwain Wacko said the whole process raised a lot of questions.

“I continue to be trouble by this. How did this get to five stalls at the front, which we determined are not acceptable?”

In response, Fercho said he simply didn’t catch it before it was approved.

“In this case I was copied on it, as I am with everything that comes through PDAC, but I wasn’t alerted to that until it came back as an approved item that needed to be dealt with through operations.”

Fercho said to avoid it happening again the municipality has changed the process so that it will be alerted whenever a proposal could have an impact on municipal property.

Carlos Rodriguez, co-owner of the hostel, said he understood why council wouldn’t like the idea.

“Mark came up with an idea and I thought it was good and I was willing to pay more money, but if it’s turned down I’m ok with that too,” Rodriguez said, acknowledging it would set a precedent for other businesses in town.

“Either way, I have to pay them.”

Currently in Banff it costs $30 per day for a parking spot, which equates to $900 per month or $10,800 a year, said Fercho. He proposed the hostel pay $10,000 per stall.

The second part of the notice put before council included adding up to 14 new parking spots in the parking lot on Patricia Street, across from the info centre.

If approved, the project is expected to cost approximately $210,000, which will come from the parking authority’s restricted reserve fund. Currently there is about $251,000 in the fund.

“Based on staff’s information and a review of areas that are available to create parking in town this is one of those easy wins,” said Fercho, adding there is also the possibility of installing two electric car charging stations.

Just before wrapping up the discussion, Coun. Wall said the entire fiasco should be a wake up call and that it’s time to start charging people for parking.

“This whole dance we’re doing around parking stalls is predicated on the high value of parking stalls in the downtown. It’s time the municipality accepts that and starts charging for the privilege of parking not only for these three designated stalls, but stalls in general,” said Wall.

Fercho said the idea would be included in the town’s transportation study, which is expected to be completed in the fall.

Council will make a final decision on both issues on April 18.

Paul Clarke
[email protected]

push icon
Be the first to read breaking stories. Enable push notifications on your device. Disable anytime.
No thanks