51做厙

Skip to content

New government, old tactics?

Only four people showed up for a poorly advertised meeting about the proposed Trans Mountain pipe expansion project, July 9. K. Byrne photo.

Only four people showed up for a meeting about the proposed Trans Mountain pipe expansion project, July 9. Jill Seaton, chair of the Jasper Environmental Association, believes short notice player a role in the low turn out. K. Byrnes photo.
Only four people showed up for a poorly advertised meeting about the proposed Trans Mountain pipe expansion project, July 9. K. Byrne photo.

When Canadians went to the polls last November many voters hoped a new government would usher in an era of greater transparency and public engagement, particularly when it came to important infrastructure projects, like pipelines.

Unfortunately, it doesnt look like much has changed.

Last week, a federally appointed panel tip-toed into Jasper hoping they could get in and out of town without anyone noticingor at least thats how it seems.

Without any public advertising, besides a press release published on a government website on June 30 and a lonesome tweet on July 7 by the department of Natural Resources, nobody in town seemed to know about the meeting, except for four locals who also seemed just as perplexed about the low turn out.

The problem is that the panel was in Jasper to specifically engage local and Indigenous communities about Kinder Morgans proposed Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) pipeline project, which was conditionally approved by the National Energy Board in May.

If approved, the twined pipeline would allow 890,000 barrels of oil to pass through Jasper National Park a day raising the stakes for an environmental disaster if the pipeline were to ever rupture.

In response to the NEBs conditional approvalwhich is subject to 157 conditions, including 49 environmental requirementsNational Resources Minister Jim Carr, appointed a panel to travel across Alberta and British Columbia to specifically listen to local communities, stakeholders, and Indigenous groups before the government makes a final decision on the project, which must be made on or before Dec. 19, 2016.

If the government is truly committed to listening to the publics concerns about the project the first step should be letting the public know about the meetings by contacting local NGOs, private organizations, local municipal governments and dare we say itthrough advertising.

But then again, perhaps the government isnt really interested in actively engaging the public because then they might actually have to do something.

When the 51做厙 asked the panel why the meeting wasnt publically advertised the panel admitted the meetings were announced last minute, but said they extended invitations to locals, businesses and NGOs.

Apparently those invitations never made it to their intended recipients because after following up with the Jasper Environmental Association, representatives from the Jasper Park Chamber of Commerce, Tourism Jasper staff and Mayor Richard Ireland, not a single organization was aware of the meeting.

Adding insult to injury, the panel quickly deflected responsibility for the poor turnout claiming they dont work for the federal government so its not their responsibility to let people know about the meetings.

The panel and the federal government should both be embarrassed with how theyve gone about listening to Canadians about this controversial project, but then again Prime Minister Justin

Trudeau already said hes in favour of the project before he was elected, so perhaps this panel is more about paying lip service then actually listening to the public?

It wouldnt be the first time weve had a federal government fail to listen to Canadians and we saw how that turned out.

push icon
Be the first to read breaking stories. Enable push notifications on your device. Disable anytime.
No thanks