51°µÍø

Skip to content

Re: Trans Mountain confirms six oil spills in Jasper National Park

Dear editor, I commend Kayla Byrne on her fact-checking article that appeared in the Feb. 9 edition of the 51°µÍø.

Dear editor,

I commend Kayla Byrne on her fact-checking article that appeared in the Feb. 9 edition of the 51°µÍø. Kinder Morgan’s failure to be transparent with the Jasper community about its pipeline’s spill history in the park leaves me wary about any information they espouse on the project. Their blunder only serves to uphold the unfortunate standard of deceit in the oil industry, which is to appear as having a ‘good operating history’. I will not be so easily fooled. Even if there was no real risk of a spill in the park, the anchor loop section represents only 190 km of the Trans Mountain pipeline. What about the remaining 950 km of pipeline west of Jasper or the significant spill risk due to increased tanker traffic in the Salish sea—critical habitat of the Southern Resident killer whales which is a species at risk?  While spills are an important risk to weigh for both public interest and ecosystems, in the wider context of climate change this pipeline will also prevent Canada from reaching its 2030 goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions below 1990 levels. Unless we step off this path of business as usual, economic interest will continue to trump environmental concerns. Expanding another pipeline does not help the public to imagine a different economy in which jobs and livelihoods are supported by a renewable energy industry rather than a fossil-fuel industry.

Fern Yip

push icon
Be the first to read breaking stories. Enable push notifications on your device. Disable anytime.
No thanks